The Board of Regents began reviewing budget details during the board’s meeting Feb. 17 at CU Boulder. The board could vote on a budget as early as its next regular meeting, April 6-7 at CU Denver, after the state’s Joint Budget Committee has proposed the state budget.
The presentation to the board by Todd Saliman, vice president and chief financial officer, said the suggested budget takes into account the modest state funding increase as currently proposed by Gov. Hickenlooper and projected enrollment growth. The board also considers budget possibilities should state funding remain flat or decrease.
“If the Legislature for some reason were not able to fund the governor’s budget request … the impacts are real,” Saliman said. Reduced state funding would mean less for deferred maintenance and likely would affect tuition rates. Targeted cuts would be possible, too.
Tuition and mandatory fee increases at CU Boulder are proposed at 4.91 percent for freshmen and transfer students only; because of a guaranteed tuition policy enacted last year, continuing students at CU Boulder would see no increase. UCCS has an increase of 3.43 percent for tuition and mandatory fees; at CU Denver, it’s 3.14 percent.
The 2.5 percent merit pool for compensation is consistent with the governor’s budget request.
Campus financial officers also presented details to the board. UCCS, which has enjoyed recent record enrollment, expects continued increases next year. Boulder reported higher undergraduate enrollments than budgeted, especially among nonresident undergraduates. Both indicated drops in enrollment of international students, as did CU Denver.
Most of the board discussion focused on CU Denver, which last year saw a revenue shortfall. Chancellor Dorothy Horrell spoke at length about her proposal for a new strategic investment in the campus – an additional $5 million annually for the next decade – as part of an effort to “establish CU Denver as a leading urban public research university.”
Members of the board expressed guarded support.
“If you go back 10 years, CU Denver was not a research institution … and now it’s trying to become something it hasn’t historically been,” said Regent Kyle Hybl, R-Colorado Springs, who urged caution in case the goal proves unfeasible.
Regent Stephen Ludwig, D-Denver, said the strategy of increasing spending on graduate programs while simultaneously working to recruit and retain undergraduates appeared “confusing.”
Regent Linda Shoemaker, D-Boulder, said she would support such an investment.
“I feel like (CU Denver) has been sort of a stepchild among the campuses,” Shoemaker said. “I do believe you guys are going to make good decisions about where that money goes.”
Horrell said for CU Denver not to establish itself as a premier public research university “would be an abdication of the responsibilities we have.”
“Nothing has come easy for CU Denver,” Horrell said. “It has been incredibly tenacious and resourceful in being able to do what it has done. … I absolutely feel this is the right thing to do.”
President Bruce Benson said he’s “bound and determined” to see the plan succeed.
“I think now we’ve got the right people and we’re going to make it work,” Benson said.
— This article originally appeared in the Feb. 23 edition of CU Connections.